On Jan. 23, 2014, a distinguished panel of experts shared their views on the prospects of economic reform in China with an audience at UC San Diego. Among the panelists were IRPS Professors Barry Naughton, Susan Shirk, and Victor Shih, Professor Chen Zhimin of Fudan University, and Professor Wu Jinglian (å´æ•¬ç) of the China State Council Development Research Center. Professor Wu is one of the most preeminent economists in China and a champion of free market reform. He also served as advisor to former Premier Zhu Rongji and mentor to Zhou Xiaochuan (PBOC Governor) and Lou Jiwei (Minister of Finance). Professor Lei Guang presided as chair and translated for Professor Wu.
Live tweeting from @IRPS panel featuring Profs Shirk, Naughton, @vshih2, & prominent Chinese economist Wu Jinglian pic.twitter.com/Ac0r2anYtV
” Jack Zhang (@HanFeiTzu) January 24, 2014
Reflecting on the Third Plenum of the 18th CCP Congress in November 2013, which presented a wide-ranging blueprint for reform, Professor Naughton expressed cautious optimism about the reform. Professor Wu interpreted the plenum as a conclusive end to a decade-long debate about the reform in China: the market (rather than the state) will now have a decisive role in resource allocation. After being pulled in two different directions by the expansion of market forces on the one hand and the growth of state power and crony capitalism on the other, the plenum charts a course towards an integrated, open, competitive and rule-based market economy. Though more hopeful now than he has been in over a decade, Professor Wu is not as optimistic as Professor Naughton. He sees major obstacles from entrenched interests.
Professor Shih, the latest addition to the 21st Century China Program's all-star-team and renowned scholar on the political economy of Chinese finance, echoed Professor Wu's concerns. He faults the plenum for making too many vague promises, containing internal contradictions, and being disappointing on political reform. He also discussed the persistent moral hazard problem in the banking sector and the difficulty of reforming the system without financial panic.
Professor Shirk noted that the obstacle to economic reform is always political because reformers must overcome vested interests that benefit from the existing system. Her own research illustrates how Deng Xiaoping was able to design an effective political strategy for Opening and Reform by playing to the provinces and building a new coalition for reform. She fears that contemporaries are drawing the wrong lessons from Deng's reform legacy.
Shirk: More powerful Xi = good? Wrong lesson to take from 1980s is that reform was made possible by strong leadership under Deng Xiaoping.
” Jack Zhang (@HanFeiTzu) January 24, 2014
A key question to ask is how reformers today can build such a winning coalition? Local governments and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are the biggest losers in new blueprint for reform, Professor Wu pointed out. Professor Shirk speculated that the push for new free trade zones (FTZs) in Shanghai and 12 other sites might be a way to generate local support by offering the opportunity to grow the economy through liberalization and the accompanying windfall in revenues.
Jack Zhang
Latest posts by Jack Zhang (see all)
- Effects of the Trade War: Three Questions with Yasheng Huang - October 24, 2019
- The State of US-China Policy: Three Questions with Jeffrey Bader - September 4, 2019
- To Measure Xi Jinping’s Power, Look to the Provinces and the Garrisons - October 11, 2017